Exxon foe says bigger InterOil offer still isn’t good enough

epa05447294 (FILE) A file picture dated 27 July 2006 shows customers pumping gasoline at an Exxon station in Brooklyn, New York, USA. ExxonMobil released their 2nd quarter earnings report on 29 July 2016 saying their net income stood at 1,7 billion USD, a decline from 4,19 billion USD in 2015 as low fuel prices continue to affect energy companies' profits.  EPA/JUSTIN LANE

 

Bloomberg

Exxon Mobil Corp.’s offer to raise its bid for InterOil Corp. to as high as $3.9 billion isn’t enough to pacify the deal’s most prominent opponent.
InterOil founder Phil Mulacek, who left in in 2013 and remains the third-largest shareholder, said Exxon still isn’t offering shareholders full value for InterOil’s hydrocarbon reserves in Papua New Guinea. Exxon last week increased the amount of gas reserves for which it would pay a bonus to shareholders, essentially boosting its maximum offer by 9.8 percent.
Mulacek’s opposition complicates what would be Exxon’s largest acquisition since 2010 and the Irving, Texas-based company’s plans to assimilate InterOil’s gas reserves into its existing Papua New Guinea liquefied natural gas project. The Court of Appeal of Yukon in Canada halted the deal in November after an appeal from Mulacek.
“The key points we have stressed from the beginning are not addressed at all by the recent Exxon-IOC proposed offer,” Mulacek said by e-mail. “We remain opposed.” Spokespersons for InterOil didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
Lauren Kerr, an Exxon spokeswoman, declined to comment. InterOil shares in New York rose 0.4 percent Wednesday to close at $49.92, the highest level since Oct. 19.
Exxon is offering a deal that would pay InterOil shareholders an up-front fee for their shares as well as a so-called ‘contingent resource payment’ bonus based on an estimate of how much gas can be recovered from the Elk and Antelope fields in Papua New Guinea, in which InterOil maintains a 36.5 percent stake.
Exxon last week raised the cap on the extra payment to 11 trillion cubic feet, from it’s original 10 trillion.

ESTIMATING RESERVES
Mulacek called the increase “illusory” and said the real issue isn’t the cap, but the way that Exxon is estimating the reserves. Exxon should pay based on the initial estimate as well as on a second estimate reached after production begins, when more information will be made available.
Mulacek also said he believes an appraisal well being used to estimate reserves missed its target and will underestimate the amount of gas in place. InterOil said in a press release Friday that the well, known as Antelope-7, has been drilled to 2,127 meters (6,979 feet) of its proposed 2,300-meter depth and has not hit the reservoir yet.
InterOil in 2014 sold Total SA about 40 percent of the Elk and Antelope fields in a deal that also included contingent resource payments based on reserves. Mulacek also wants those payments passed through to InterOil shareholders.

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend