Kurdish factions should make common cause

A fighter from the Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG), part of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), holds her weapon in the village of Fatisah in the northern Syrian province of Raqa on May 25, 2016.  US-backed Syrian fighters and Iraqi forces pressed twin assaults against the Islamic State group, in two of the most important ground offensives yet against the jihadists. The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), formed in October 2015, announced on May 24 its push for IS territory north of Raqa city, which is around 90 kilometres (55 miles) south of the Syrian-Turkish border and home to an estimated 300,000 people. The SDF is dominated by the Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) -- largely considered the most effective independent anti-IS force on the ground in Syria -- but it also includes Arab Muslim and Christian fighters.  / AFP PHOTO / DELIL SOULEIMAN
WASHINGTON

One cause for Syria’s torments is that regional powers have used proxy forces to advance their position in the “great game” of influence, without regard for the effects on the Syrian people.
An example is the standoff between two Syrian Kurdish militia groups. One, known as the YPG, appears to be tacitly backed by an odd coalition that includes the United States, and, less visibly, Russia and Iran. The other, much smaller group known as the Peshmerga of Rojava, or “Roj Pesh” is supported by Iraqi Kurdistan and the official, Saudi-backed, Syrian opposition, and it might also get support from Turkey.
The Kurdish factional politics may reflect an attempt by the regional powers to check the expansion of a “greater Kurdistan.” All Kurdish groups want this big nation as an aspirational goal, but they know it’s bitterly opposed by the neighbors, with whom they must work to survive.
The YPG and Roj Pesh sometimes seem to be chess pieces in a game to block unity and expansion. A transnational movement is less likely to spread from Iraq’s Kurdish Regional Government across the Syrian Kurdish land known as “Rojava” — let alone into Turkey and Iran — if the YPG and Roj Pesh refuse to fight together, as seems to be the case today.
After travelling recently to a training camp inside Syria for the YPG and its allied Sunni Arab partners, I have a sense of the military power of this group — and why U.S. commanders have given them such a strategic role. But the Roj Pesh were still a mystery, so I asked the Kurdish Regional Government to arrange an interview.
Brig. Gen. Mohammed Rejeb Dehdo, commander of the Roj Pesh, told me by telephone Thursday that he has 3,000 trained fighters who are ready to move across the border from their Iraqi camps near the Mosul Dam and along the eastern Syrian border, into the ancestral lands that Kurds call Rojava. But he says they’re blocked by the far larger YPG, which has at least 25,000 battle-hardened troops in Syria.
The Roj Pesh say they have been trained by the elite Zeravani Force that’s backed by the Kurdistan Democratic Party, or KDP, headed by President Masoud Barzani, who runs the Kurdistan Regional Government in Erbil and has managed to stay friendly with the United States and Turkey at the same time.
“We are prepared to work together” with the YPG, Dehdo said. He said plans for joint operations were being explored by the United States until they collapsed in August over where the joint command center would be located. The YPG nominated Sulaymaniyah, which is ruled by the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, or PUK, a group that’s friendly to both Washington and Tehran. The Roj Pesh wanted Zakho, a city in northern Kurdistan, close to the Syrian border, that’s controlled by the Barzanis.
“They are all Kurds. They want to go back home. There is no reason why the YPG is preventing their return,” argues a spokesman for Kurdish national security adviser Masrour Barzani. “We feel this unit is another option for the U.S. It doesn’t have to rely solely on the YPG.”
Masrour Barzani echoes this endorsement. “Peshmerga of Rojava is an organized, battle-tested force” and “not affiliated with any suspicious groups,” he told me in a statement.
Though the Roj Pesh would add little military clout to the Syria fight, it might give the Kurds more weight with the overall Syrian opposition.
Then there’s the PKK issue. Gen. Dehdo, like his backers in Iraqi Kurdistan, shares the Turkish view that, “there are no differences, political and military, between the YPG and the PKK.” The latter group, whose acronym stands for Kurdistan Worker’s Party, is seen by Turkey as a terrorist group that threatens security in the Kurdish areas of southeast Turkey.
PKK supporters argue that the terrorist designation is nonsense. Many say they favour resumed dialogue with Ankara if it will halt its rocket and artillery attacks on Kurdish strongholds in southeast Turkey.
An intriguing hint of the proxy wars inside Syria came from Lt. Col. Hussein Ahmed Hassan, the Roj Pesh intelligence chief. He told me in a telephone interview Thursday that Iranian commanders from what he called the “Johariya Force” have helped train and supply some members of the YPG. He said, further, that “Iranian and Syrian intelligence officers have told the YPG commanders not to allow the Roj Pesh into Syria.”
This is the kind of divide-and-rule manipulation that allowed European colonial powers to play off different Kurdish and Arab factions for the past century. The Kurds would be wiser if they could make common cause, rather than play the neo-imperialist game of the regional powers.
— Washington Post Writers Group

David-Ignatius
David Ignatius, best-selling author and prize-winning columnist for the Washington Post, has been covering the Middle East and the CIA for more than twenty-five years

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend