Russian jets in repeated ‘aggressive’ passes of US warship

Washington / AFP

A Russian military jet came within 30 feet of a US destroyer in international waters in the Baltic Sea, US officials say, but Russia on Thursday defended the maneuver as safe.
Russian aircraft repeatedly buzzed the USS Donald Cook this week, including an incident on Tuesday in which a Russian Su-24 flew 30 feet (nine meters) above the ship in a “simulated attack profile,” the US military’s European Command said.
“We have deep concerns about the unsafe and unprofessional Russian flight maneuvers,” EUCOM said in a statement.
“These actions have the potential to unnecessarily escalate tensions between countries and could result in a miscalculation.”
Ties between Russia and the West have plunged to their lowest point since the Cold War over Moscow’s annexation of the Crimean peninsula from Ukraine in 2014 and its support for separatist rebels in the east of the country.
Russia countered saying it was stunned by Washington’s reaction to the fly-by incident.
Su-24 planes were conducting test flights in the area and “having observed the ship, turned away in observance of all safety measures,” Russian defense ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said in a statement posted on the ministry’s Facebook page.
“Frankly speaking, we don’t understand such a sore reaction from our US colleagues,” the statement added. EUCOM released video showing warplanes zooming so close past the Cook that one sailor can be heard saying: “He is below the bridge wing,” meaning the plane was flying lower than the highest point of the ship. A senior US defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said: “This is more aggressive than anything we’ve seen in some time.”
White House spokesman Josh Earnest called the overflights “entirely inconsistent with the professional norms of militaries operating in proximity to each other in international waters and international airspace.”

Altitude of 100 feet
The maneuvers began on Monday while the destroyer was located about 70 nautical miles from Kaliningrad, a Russian exclave, in international waters.
Two Russian Su-24s flew 20 times past the USS Cook at a distance of less than 1,000 yards (meters) and at an altitude of about 100 feet, the official said.
Then on Tuesday, a Russian Ka-27 Helix anti-submarine helicopter flew seven times around the destroyer, taking photographs as it passed.
Shortly after, two Su-24s roared toward the ship, making 11 close-range and low-altitude passes, including one that was “so low it created wake in the water,” the official said.
The plane was “wings clean,” meaning it was not visibly armed, he added.
US sailors tried multiple times to hail the Russian craft on international frequencies but got no response.
“The Russian aircraft flew in a simulated attack profile and failed to respond to repeated safety advisories in both English and Russian,” EUCOM said.
“USS Donald Cook’s commanding officer deemed several of these maneuvers as unsafe and unprofessional.”
Still, Russia defended the action.
“With the US Navy destroyer in operational proximity of the Russian navy’s Baltic fleet base, the principle of its free sea navigation does not negate the principle of free air navigation of Russian planes,” the Russian defence ministry statement said.
A Polish helicopter had been conducting drills on the destroyer and was refueling during one of the overflights.
“As a safety precaution, flight operations were suspended until the Su-24s departed the area,” EUCOM said.
The Pentagon periodically decries the risky tactics displayed by Russian pilots.
“There have been repeated incidents over the last year where the Russian military, including Russian military aircraft, have come close enough to each other or have come close enough to other air and sea traffic to raise serious safety concerns,” Earnest said.
Exactly two years ago—on April 12, 2014—a Russian Su-24 made numerous close-range, low-altitude passes near the USS Donald Cook while it was in the Black Sea, in an incident the Pentagon at the time called a “provocative act.”