Trump ‘inquiry’ ups stakes in Russia probe

Bloomberg

President Donald Trump’s formal demand that the Justice Department investigate possible surveillance of his campaign marks a turning point: It’s the first time he’s using the authority of his office to counter the Russia probe since he fired FBI Director James Comey last year.
“I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes — and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!” Trump said on Twitter, where he has often protested the investigation he calls a “witch hunt.”
The move from tweets to action was urged on by Republican Devin Nunes, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who said on Fox News that US spy agencies crossed a “red line” if they planted a paid informant inside Trump’s campaign.
Some of Trump’s allies are beginning to push for Congress to open an investigation akin to the Church Committee’s probe in the 1970s into executive branch abuses of intelligence agencies to conduct improper domestic security operations, according to people familiar with the discussions.
The Justice Department, meanwhile, is bracing to see exactly what, if any action, Trump orders them to take this week. There’s no evidence that the FBI installed an informant or spy in Trump’s campaign. The FBI did rely on an informant who was in contact with Trump associates, according to two US officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Trump tweeted last week that reports suggest “there was indeed at least one FBI representative implanted, for political purposes, into my campaign.” The New York Times reported that agents sent an informant to talk to two of Trump’s campaign advisers but “only after they received evidence that the pair had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the campaign.”
The Justice Department responded by asking its inspector general to expand an ongoing review to include whether “any impropriety or political motivation” was a factor in how the FBI conducted its counterintelligence investigation related to the Russia probe, spokeswoman Sarah Isgur
Flores said.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the Russia probe now being run by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, said in a statement that “if anyone did infiltrate or surveil participants in a presidential campaign for inappropriate purposes, we need to know about it and take appropriate action.”
In addition, in March, Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed John Huber, a US attorney based in Utah, to conduct an internal probe into complaints of FBI bias and wrongdoing in response to Republicans allegations of anti-Trump bias during the 2016 campaign. Trump and some Republican lawmakers are increasingly pressing the argument that Mueller’s inquiry into Russian meddling, and whether anyone close to Trump colluded in it, should be shut down because it was irreversibly tainted by improper actions early in the inquiry.
Democrats — who have long suggested that Trump was looking for grounds to fire Rosenstein, if not Mueller — pushed back against the suggestion the FBI improperly spied on Trump’s campaign.