‘Fiat Chrysler-UAW contracts not tainted’

epa05721680 A Fiat company logo at the Brussels Motor Show in Brussels, Belgium, 16 January 2017. Reports earlier in January stated that the US Environmental Protection Agency EPA accused Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) of rigging more than 100,000 diesel-powered vehicles to deceive emissions tests. FCA shares tumbled some 18 per cent at the New York Stock Exchange, NYSE, following the  announcement, and caused a brief suspension of trading in FCA shares. The Brussels Motor Show runs from 14 to 22 January 2017.  EPA/STEPHANIE LECOCQ

Bloomberg

The president of the United Auto Workers denied that contracts with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV were tainted by a scheme in which top labour negotiators were enriching themselves from a union training fund.
In a letter to UAW members, President Dennis Williams said Fiat Chrysler’s former top labour negotiator “by his own admission is a crook and a liar.”
The former Fiat Chrysler executive, Alphons Iacobelli, pleaded guilty to diverting more than $1.5 million to UAW officials and representatives and $1 million to himself from a training centre jointly operated by the union and the carmaker.
Fiat Chrysler executives sought to corrupt contract talks by bribing UAW officials, prosecutors said in Iacobelli’s plea agreement. Iacobelli, who led US labour relations for the automaker until June 2015, paid former UAW Vice President General Holiefield and his wife more than $1.2 million for them to buy jewellery, designer clothing and furniture, and to pay off a mortgage. Iacobelli also diverted money to spend on a Ferrari, a swimming pool and Mont Blanc pens for himself, according to prosecutors.
“While Mr. Iacobelli will have to answer for his criminal conduct, it appears that in an attempt to get lenient treatment from the government he is now falsely spinning his crimes as an effort to corrupt the collective bargaining process between the UAW and Fiat Chrysler,” Williams said. “There is simply no truth to the claim that this misconduct compromised the negotiation of our collective bargaining agreement or had any impact on union funds.”

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend