Bullet-train pledge, splits cost Zimbabwe opposition in vote

Bloomberg

As Zimbabwean opposition leader Nelson Chamisa considers mounting a legal challenge to last week’s election results, he’s also counting the cost of fissures within his alliance and campaign pledges that made him appear out of touch with voters.
Emmerson Mnangagwa’s victory in the parliamentary and presidential ballots has left Chamisa’s Movement for Democratic Change without enough seats to prevent the ruling Zimbabwe African National Front-Patriotic Front from changing the constitution. It’s also exposed the opposition’s missteps in the lead-up to the July 30 vote, even after Chamisa revitalised the alliance in the wake of former leader Morgan Tsvangirai’s death in February.
The MDC’s alliance with six other parties was fractious at best, according to analysts including Rashweat Mukundu at the Zimbabwe Democracy Institute in Harare, the capital. That led it to field multiple candidates in areas where a single ticket might have boosted its tally.
“The MDC could’ve scooped an extra 10 seats to block Zanu-PF’s two-thirds majority if they didn’t split the vote by fielding two or more candidates for some single seats,” Mukundu said. “If they want to win, they’re going to have to focus on uniting the opposition and finding common purpose and cohesion.”
For instance, across the two western Matabeleland provinces, the MDC fielded multiple candidates in each constituency, splitting the vote and allowing Zanu-PF to clean up in a region analysts had said would never vote for Mnangagwa because of his role in the gukurahundi massacres of the 1980s. Mnangagwa was minister of state security at the time of the killings, in which at least 20,000 people died.