Trump plan aims new foreign tax at Apple and other MNCs

Bloomberg

On the last page of a nine-page tax plan that calls for slashing business rates, President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans proposed a little-noticed, brand-new tax that may hit companies like Apple Inc. and Pfizer Inc.
It’s contained in one sentence: “To prevent companies from shifting profits to tax havens, the framework includes rules to protect the US tax base by taxing at a reduced rate and on a global basis the foreign profits of US multinational corporations.” The rate and formula aren’t specified, but that lone sentence carries multibillion-dollar implications for multinationals. Their lobbyists are noticing. Proposing a new tax on US companies’ foreign profits “is appalling,” said Ken Kies of Federal Policy Group, whose clients include General Electric Co. and Microsoft Corp. “The whole point of this tax reform was to make US corporations more competitive. It’s going to do the opposite.”
Trump and congressional leaders buoyed US stocks and seized national attention last week as they released a broad tax plan that would cut the corporate rate to 20 percent from 35 percent while also cutting rates for pass-through businesses and individuals. Details of those proposals remain sketchy—but there’s even less clarity around the plan for revamping international corporate taxes. As specifics begin to emerge, including at a Senate Finance Committee hearing on Tuesday, opposition may increase.
It’s not all bad news for multinationals. On the positive side, the framework would allow them to bring back to the US, or repatriate, years’ worth of foreign earnings after paying a low tax rate—perhaps 10 percent—on them.
And even the new minimum foreign tax might not be as bad as it could have been. Four tax experts told Bloomberg News the framework’s wording suggests that despite the tax’s goal, multinationals will be able to keep using sophisticated tax-winnowing techniques and tax havens. While they may still face billions of dollars in new tax payments, it won’t be as bad as it could have been for them thanks to one word in the framework’s language: “global.”
Trump and Congress haven’t specified the minimum rate. One number batted around in recent weeks is 10 percent, said Kathleen Ferrell, a tax partner at law firm Davis Polk. Steven Rosenthal, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center and a former tax partner at Ropes & Gray, said that 15 percent might be more likely.
It’s also unclear from the brief description in the framework how the tax would work. But here’s a general idea: Congress would set a low tax rate—say 15 percent—that would serve as a minimum rate for companies on their offshore subsidiaries’ earnings.
Any multinational that paid more than that minimum to foreign governments wouldn’t owe the tax in the US But if a company’s overseas taxes fell below the minimum—a sign that it made heavy use of tax havens—the company would pay the US the difference.