Meta seeks out secrets from over 100 firms to win antitrust suit

Bloomberg

To defend itself against the federal government, Meta Platforms Inc says it needs its rivals to divulge some of their most closely held secrets.
Facebook’s parent company has so far subpoenaed 132 companies for documents, including Snap Inc., ByteDance Ltd’s TikTok and the audio startup Clubhouse, and has warned that it may seek information from 100 more. The subpoenas have set off a cascade of legal challenges from Meta’s rivals, which accuse the company of using antitrust litigation as an excuse to dig through their confidential data.
The hunt for information was triggered by the US Federal Trade Commission’s lawsuit against Meta in 2020, alleging that the company monopolised the social networking market in part through its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. Meta contests the allegation that it has a monopoly and argues that the market is constantly evolving, with newcomers like TikTok and Clubhouse as key examples.
A trial isn’t likely until 2024 at the earliest, but both sides are marshaling evidence for the case.
Kellie Lerner, an antitrust litigator at the law firm Robins Kaplan LLP who isn’t involved in the suit, said Meta’s requests seek “massive amounts of competitively sensitive information.”
“You have a company accused of anticompetitive conduct who is now seeking very competitively sensitive information in discovery,” said Lerner, who has litigated many antitrust disputes. “The sheer breadth of what they are trying to get through discovery is something that, in my view, is not typical.”
Meta has asked for documents relating to some of the most important and sensitive elements of how competitors do business, according to court filings, including how they acquire users, scale up products and make money from features. It also wants materials on rivals’ marketing and sales strategies,
quality metrics, contact information for their biggest advertisers, and details on their efforts to attract users from competitors, among other secrets.
Meta’s request is “overbroad and abusive,” Snap said in court filings. A California federal judge was expected to decide how much Snap — a key figure in the FTC suit and a company that Meta previously tried to acquire — must turn over to aid the defense’s case.
Meta’s request seeks “materials on every product and nearly every aspect of Snap’s business, with a time range that spans almost Snap’s entire existence,” lawyers for that company said. “Snap should not be forced to hand Meta insiders a competitive playbook.”
In court filings, Meta said it needs the information from its rivals to dispute the
FTC’s contentions that it is a monopoly and doesn’t face competition.
“Meta competes vigorously with many companies to help people share,
connect, communicate or simply be entertained,” Meta spokesperson Christopher Sgro said.
“As a natural step in preparing our defense to the FTC’s lawsuit, we have served subpoenas on companies with which we compete or which we believe have other information relating to the FTC’s claims.”
While Snap is among the most vocal opponents of Meta’s subpoenas, it’s not the only one. TikTok complained that Meta has sought its “most confidential and highly sensitive business information.” Pinterest Inc, Microsoft Corp’s LinkedIn and others raised concerns about Meta’s “highly invasive” requests, which they said seek their “most competitively sensitive documents.”
Other companies that Meta has subpoenaed include Tinder parent company Match Group Inc, Twitter Inc, Reddit Inc and Oracle Corp.
Meta’s document requests also aren’t limited to US social networking services. It has sought information from Line Corp — a company owned by SoftBank Corp and Naver Corp that’s the top messaging service in Japan, Taiwan and Thailand — as well as Japanese e-commerce giant Rakuten Group Inc, which owns Viber, a messaging app popular in India, Ukraine and Russia.
Beyond the scope of the requests, Meta’s rivals say the company’s history of hoarding intelligence on competitors should be considered.
TikTok is worried that Meta’s lawyers may inadvertently disclose information that could be used by the company, given its history of copying the features and tactics of its competitors.