JPMorgan trading dip should be taken in stride

Why so surprised, bank investors? Shares of two of the largest US lenders, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp., tumbled recently to their lowest levels in at least four months after executives said second-quarter trading revenue is poised to fall at least 10 percent from the same period a year ago. Rival Wall Street banks with large trading operations — Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Citigroup Inc. and Morgan Stanley — also slid.
It’s not that investors weren’t prepared for a drop, but the guidance from executives was more dire than many had been expecting. Even so, the market reaction seems excessive given the slew of data pointing to a slowdown in this corner of Wall Street.
As my colleague Lisa Abramowicz wrote earlier this month, weaker trading and issuance volumes should damp expectations of a continued boom in that business. Now, two months into the quarter, that’s shaping up to be a certainty. Data from the New York Federal Reserve shows that most of the uplift in bond trading is in less-profitable government-backed debt, rather than corporate or mortgage-backed securities.
And even if you’re not Sherlock Holmes, a quick glance at the volatility index — which has sunk to its lowest level since early 2007 and is a key driver of trading — points to lackluster results. Moreover, it’s basically impossible for second-quarter trading revenues to topple those from a year earlier, considering the latter included the UK’s unexpected Brexit result, which created a level of uncertainty that’s unlikely to be replicated in the near term.
As I’ve written, there are reasons to be upbeat about U.S. banks, even if trading revenue retreats and the yield curve continues to flatten. Beyond expected rate hikes, executives including JPMorgan Chief Financial Officer Marianne Lake are becoming increasingly upbeat about the idea of deregulation that doesn’t involve Congress needing to rewrite law. On Wednesday, she noted that proposed easing of the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review, which stress-tests large banks and determines their capacity for payouts, is a “real possibility, if not a
probability.”
Any progress on that front will bolster the ability of the largest banks to return more capital to shareholders in the form of dividends and buybacks, which will in turn boost profitability. That itself should have investors cheering or at least offset jeering ahead of swings in a business that has historically whipsawed.
— Bloomberg

Gillian Tan is a Bloomberg Gadfly columnist covering deals and private equity. She previously was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal. She is a qualified chartered accountant