Wednesday , 17 December 2025

Investigators recommend trial for embattled Pakistan premier ­

epa06029565 Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif talks with journalists after appearing before an investigation team formed by the Supreme Court of Pakistan to investigate the Sharif family's offshore properties that appeared in Panama papers, in Islamabad, Pakistan, 15 June 2017. The Pakistani Supreme Court on 20 April 2017 ordered the creation of a new commission to investigate the source of funds from companies associated with the family of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, after he was implicated in the massive Panama Papers scandal in 2016. Five judges in charge of the case, also concluded there was insufficient evidence to disqualify Sharif from his position.  EPA/T. MUGHAL

Bloomberg

Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif may face trial after a high-level inquiry found he was unable to account for the disparity between his wealth and his known sources of income, plunging the country deeper into political crisis just months before elections.
The Supreme Court is due to review the findings and will convene a hearing into the allegations on July 17. If the court accepts the charges it could lead to Sharif’s resignation or removal from power under the constitution.
“There exists a significant disparity between the wealth declared” and the means through which he generated income, according to a report by investigators appointed by the Supreme Court in April. The investigators submitted their report to a panel of justices, who ordered the report be made public on Monday.
If an accused cannot account for his sources of income, “the court shall presume, unless the contrary is proved, that the person is guilty of the offence of corruption,” the report reads. Pakistan’s benchmark KSE100 Index declined 3.4 percent, the most among stocks globally, at 9:57 a.m local in Karachi. The report turned out to be more damaging than expected and investors will remain confused amid the most political noise since the government took office in 2013, said Faisal Bilwani, head of equities at Elixir Securities Pakistan Pvt.
The Prime Minister’s daughter, Maryam Nawaz Sharif, rejected the report in tweet: “Every contradiction will not only be contested but decimated” in the Supreme Court, she wrote. “Not a single penny of public exchequer involved.”
Sharif will challenge the investigators’ findings in court, the minister for planning and reform, Ahsan Iqbal, said on Monday.

Damaged Goods
The findings “will have a huge impact on Pakistani politics as it will become a major election issue,” political and security analyst Zahid Hussain said in Islamabad. “The major problem will be political uncertainty. Nawaz Sharif will be damaged goods.”
Opposition leader Imran Khan of Tehreek-i-Insaf party demanded Sharif to resign over the findings.
Removal of the prime minister from power could impede an economy which is growing its fastest in a decade. Sharif, who has pledged to step down if found guilty of graft by the court, has denied any wrongdoing.
Pakistan’s economy grew 5.3 percent in 2016, it’s highest in 10 years, after Sharif averted a balance-of-payment crisis in 2013 with help from an International Monetary Fund loan and Chinese infrastructure and energy financing. The country’s foreign exchange reserves touched a peak of about $19 billion in October though the country’s benchmark stock index has plunged about 7 percent since it was included in the MSCI Inc.’s emerging markets index in June.

Coup Prone
The top court took up graft charges against the premier in November after a report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists showed Sharif’s children either owned or have signing rights to authorize transactions of four offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands. Those holdings were alleged to have been used to make property purchases in London. Sharif’s political rivals doubted the premier’s family obtained those assets legally.
Politicians in the coup-prone country have long been accused of corruption and have often been thrown out of power on charges which may have been hard to prove in court.

Leave a Reply