The Gulf Time Newspaper One of the finest business newspapers in the UAE brought to you by our professional writers and editors.
Could this economic slowdown be different for industrial companies? There are valid reasons to think so, but it’s becoming harder to make the argument.
The unwinding of the pandemic surge in consumer demand for physical goods has picked up in recent weeks, with retailers from Target Corp. to Walmart Inc. and Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc. sounding a cautious note on inventories and future sales. This is to some extent unavoidable and reflects a normalization of buying habits rather than a collapse in consumer demand, but a slowdown is underway and may gain momentum as inflation eats into purchasing power. However, partly because of those Covid distortions in behavior, some investors and analysts have posited that industrial capital spending might prove more resilient in the face of a consumer downturn than history would suggest.
For one, industrial companies have yet to see the benefits of the US’s $550 billion infrastructure bill. Structural shifts such as a shortening of global supply chains and a need to invest in making factories more environmentally friendly offer another leg of potential growth outside of normal cyclical economic factors.
The pickup in automation overhauls is unlikely to reverse, even if the labor shortage eases. Plus, there is the simple fact that the only way to combat inflation in housing and oil prices in a lasting fashion is by investing in more domestic energy infrastructure and residential construction. Supply chain logjams have prevented many industrial companies from following through on plans for higher spending, meaning there actually hasn’t yet been much of a spike in capital investments post-Covid.
Globally, the number of greenfield manufacturing projects was about 40% below pre-pandemic levels in 2021, Melius Research’s Scott Davis notes, citing data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
By most measures, there should be an industrial spending boom. It’s arguably economically irresponsible not to have one. That doesn’t mean it will happen.
Consider the housing market. Mortgage rates have surged toward 6% this week, effectively pricing a significant swath of potential buyers out of the market.
Even before the latest uptick in rates, there were signs of a cooldown: New home construction in the US fell in May to a 1.55 million annualized rate, the lowest in more than a year, according to data this week from the Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Applications for building permits, a proxy for future construction, fell to an annualized 1.7 million units, the lowest since September.
This data set is subject to significant revisions, and supply chain challenges complicate the translation to actual available inventory; builders are still sitting on large backlogs of unfinished homes. But US homebuilders are seeing yellow lights: The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo gauge of industry sentiment slid in June to the lowest level in two years, according to data released this week.
That’s a problem because even at the headier building rates of previous months, the supply-demand imbalance in the housing market was on track to linger for around a decade by some estimates.
The ideal scenario is enough of a cooling in consumer demand to ease inflation pressures but not so much of a slowdown that builders decide to materially pull back on construction.
That is an incredibly difficult needle to thread. Given the choice between bringing inflation under control in the short term and fixing the longer-term housing shortage, the Federal Reserve appears inclined to prioritize the former.