Croatia central banker sees lasting benefits from adopting euro

Bloomberg

Adopting the euro would offer “numerous and lasting” benefits for Croatia’s economy, central bank governor Boris Vujcic told Reuters, although he declined to indicate when it might enter the single currency’s ERM-2 “waiting room”.
Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic said in October that he wanted the newest European Union member to start using the euro within seven or eight years. He said Croatia hoped to enter the European exchange rate mechanism II (ERM-2) by the time it takes over the revolving presidency of the EU in 2020.
“Advantages (of euro membership) are numerous and lasting, the costs are small and mostly one-off,” Vujcic, whose current six-year term expires in July, said in an interview on Tuesday. “The biggest advantage is removal of currency risk, as most deposits and 54 percent of domestic loans are indexed to the euro. The overall amount of euro-denominated debt equals 150 percent of gross domestic product.”
Euro adoption would also reduce regulatory costs for the banking sector, more than 90 percent of which is owned by parent banks from other EU countries, he said. Vujcic declined to say when Croatia might join ERM-2, which aims to ensure currency stability for at least two years as a precursor to euro zone membership.
The central bank already keeps the national kuna currency in a managed float of roughly 7.3 to 7.7 per euro. “The central bank in fact already hedges the economy from the currency risk,” Vujcic said. “There is no doubt we will be able to keep the currency within an agreed band once we enter the ERM-2.”
But Croatia still has work to do to strengthen its economy before it can join the euro zone. “Croatia must continue its efforts on reducing macroeconomic imbalances, like the public debt to GDP ratio, and also reform to remove structural problems in the economy,” Vujcic said.
Public debt is expected to fall towards 70 percent of GDP in the next few years from just under 80 percent now. Vujcic said reforms were needed to remove obstacles that harm the business climate and discourage investors. “Court procedures are long, the regulatory framework changes too often, and some rules can even be contradictory,” Vujcic said.