BOE’s hawkish push turns rate decision into credibility test

Bloomberg

Bank of England (BOE) policy makers are heading into their meeting this week knowing that failure to deliver a once-unthinkable interest-rate hike would now raise serious questions over their credibility with markets.
Investors are almost fully pricing in a 15-basis point increase in the benchmark lending rate on November 4, while economists increasingly share that view, even as they see the decision as a far closer call.
A rate rise in the UK would be the first since the pandemic from a central bank in the world’s leading economies. It would mark a far quicker move towards normalisation than in the aftermath of the global financial crisis more than a decade ago. It’s a response to a surge in inflation that the BOE expects will linger at more than double its 2% target well into next year.
The speed of the change in narrative is remarkable considering that when policy makers last met in September, investors and economists saw barely any chance of action this year. Since then, Governor Andrew Bailey has voiced increasing concern about rising prices and signaled the bank “will have to act.”
Economists see the November 4 decision as a very close call, with a Bloomberg survey showing 51% forecast a hold and 49% a hike. In a sign of the uncertainty ahead of the decision, analysts have predicted five different potential vote splits. Of those seeing no change, most expect officials to split 7-2 in favour of staying put.
Still not all of the nine-member committee share that view, suggesting the decision could be far more uncertain than markets think. Two members have appeared to rule out a move. Three have stayed silent and could yet opt for no change. And even chief economist Huw Pill, who has predicted inflation could top 5%, says the call this month is “finely balanced.”
That’s left the divided BOE in a bind of its own making. Bailey has declined to push back against market speculation of an imminent move. Not delivering on November 4 could touch off a barrage of criticism of the central banks’ communication, with disgruntled investors caught on the wrong side of the trades questioning the BOE’s credibility. Bailey’s predecessor Mark Carney was branded the “unreliable boyfriend” during one such episode.
Bailey’s hawkish turn has also led to traders pricing in rate path that puts the central bank on course for the fastest tightening of policy this century. That would involve a move from 0.1% this week followed by a swift cycle of increases that would put the key rate at 1.25% by the end of 2022.

“Our call for a rate hike next week is finely balanced, with the committee likely to be split on the decision,” said Deutsche Bank economist Sanjay Raja. “We expect a 6-3 vote tally in favor of a rate hike” but “we see a non-negligible risk that a lift-off may be delayed to December.”
But acting could also have consequences. By increasing the focus on November, officials will now need to make the decision before seeing labour market data that will show the impact of the end of the government’s pandemic jobs support program, a crucial piece of the jigsaw in the UK’s recovery. Throw in the prospect of a very difficult economic winter in the UK, against a back drop of rising prices, taxes and virus cases, and some are worried the BOE is at risk of focusing too much on inflation-fighting credibility and heading for a policy mistake.
Bailey’s hawkish turn has also led to traders pricing in rate path that puts the central bank on course for the fastest tightening of policy this century. That would involve a move from 0.1% this week followed by a swift cycle of increases that would put the key rate at 1.25% by the end of 2022.
There’s also the issue of what to do with the BOE’s bond buying plan, which is due to run until the end of the year.
Keeping it going after raising rates might send a confusing message. But ending it, as suggested by some banks, would go against previous guidance and may give markets reason to doubt future programs. Coming so soon after a budget that saw borrowing predictions slashed, it might reawaken accusations that QE only existed to fund the government’s pandemic spending.
If the BOE were to push back against that outlook for tightening, possibly through weaker long-term inflation forecasts, it could also have consequences for markets, and prompt questions over how officials lost control of the yield curve in the first place.
“We doubt that there will be a majority at the MPC for a change in rates next week and think that the BOE will struggle to meet the already very hawkish market expectations,” said Valentin Marinov, head of G10 FX strategy at Credit Agricole.