The Gulf Time Newspaper One of the finest business newspapers in the UAE brought to you by our professional writers and editors.
Bloomberg
The US Supreme Court dealt a blow to President Donald Trump on his embattled travel ban on Wednesday, rejecting his bid to bar entry by some people with family members already in the country.
The 6-3 order by the justices—who last month let the president start restricting entry by people from six mostly Muslim countries—means the government must accept people with grandparents, cousins and other relatives in the US.
The order gave Trump a partial win on a separate issue, temporarily blocking a lower court ruling that would have opened the way for potentially thousands of refugees to enter the country in the coming months. That portion of the Supreme Court order applies while the administration appeals on that issue to a federal appellate court in San Francisco.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments on the travel ban in October. The justices on June 26 let the government enforce a limited travel ban, saying the US had to admit at least some close relatives though the court didn’t list all the relationships that qualified. The Trump administration then agreed to let people enter if they had a parent, spouse, fiance, child, sibling, son- or daughter-in-law, or a parent-in-law in the country.
But the government contended it could still exclude people whose closest relatives in the US are grandparents, grandchildren, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, cousins, or siblings-in-law. A federal trial judge in Hawaii said the administration’s standard was too restrictive and couldn’t be squared with the Supreme Court decision. US District Judge Derrick Watson also said the government couldn’t exclude refugees once a resettlement agency had promised that it would provide basic services for them.
Trump asked the Supreme Court to clarify its June 26 decision, contending that Watson disobeyed it.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from Wednesday’s action, saying they would have blocked Watson’s entire ruling.
Trump’s March 6 executive order said the 90-day travel ban and 120-day refugee ban would give officials time to assess US vetting procedures and would address an “unacceptably high†risk that terrorists could slip into the country. Lower courts had blocked the ban, saying Trump overstepped his authority and unconstitutionally targeted Muslims.
The case is Trump v. Hawaii, 16-1540.