Sunak’s tax choices to fix UK debt range from wealth to fuel

Bloomberg

The UK is still in the grip of the coronavirus crisis, but political speculation is already rife on how the country will manage the ballooning debt it has run up to fight the pandemic.
With the nation still fresh from almost a decade of austerity, there’s little appetite for spending cuts to shrink a deficit on course to reach $547 billion this year. That puts potential tax rises in focus as Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak prepares to set out plans in his March 3 budget to start restoring the public finances.
While most economists agree now isn’t the moment for fiscal tightening, the UK media has been rife with speculation that the government will try to swell its tax take, which would usually total almost 800 billion pounds. That’s been fuelled by Sunak’s insistence, repeated, that he will repair the nation’s battered public finances over time.
“Once our economy begins to recover, we should look to return the public finances to a more sustainable footing,” he said, after data showing that borrowing has ballooned again.
A major problem for Sunak is that Conservatives’ 2019 manifesto ruled out increases in UK’s three biggest taxes — income tax, National Insurance and Value Added Tax. Between them they raise over 500 billion pounds in a normal year. VAT takings in particular will have been shriveled by the crisis, and government measures to tackle it.
While increasing any of those levies might generate considerable extra revenue, that could prove highly unpopular and even risk hurting consumption once recovery gets under way. No Chancellor has boosted basic income tax rate since Labour’s Denis Healey in the 1970s. That’s left the government searching for alternatives. A Treasury spokesman said the department doesn’t comment on speculation about tax changes.
The Times reported last week that Sunak may hike a levy on businesses first because he sees that as the fairest way to raise significant sums. Corporation tax currently generates around 60 billion pounds a year.
The main rate has fallen from 28% in 2010 to 19% currently. While each percentage point increase would raise more than 3 billion pounds, any move would jar with the government’s priority of making the UK an attractive place for business after Brexit.
Another idea mooted by Times was a property tax on homes. That would replace local authority levies that net 40 billion pounds, based on 1990s valuations, and stamp duty, which takes a cut on house purchases.
Stamp duty netted the Treasury more than 12 billion pounds in the last fiscal year, but takings are probably vastly reduced by the government’s decision to temporarily exempt the first 500,000 pounds of a transaction. A more innovative and potentially hugely controversial option that could seek to address growing UK inequality would be a wealth tax.
Last year, the independent Wealth Tax Commission said the UK could raise more than 260 billion pounds with an annual charge of 1% lasting five years on individual assets above 500,000 pounds. About 8 million residents would be affected.
Sunak could also decide that it’s too early to raise taxes, choosing to tolerate a higher debt load until the UK’s recovery is assured. That tactic was mooted last week by a Treasury minister who suggested hikes could be avoided should the economy stage a strong rebound.

Combining both taxes would prove unpopular in Tory heartlands, which tend to have higher house prices, and could mean fairly large increases for the southeast of England without raising much money, according to Torsten Bell, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation. Still, such a move may prove popular in northern areas crucial to the Conservative election victory in 2019.
The Sun reported last week that a 5-pence ($0.07) increase in fuel duty is being considered — another move likely to dismay Tory backbenchers. The levy has been frozen at 57.95 pence for a decade.
The Treasury commissioned a review into Capital Gains Tax last year, which found that an increase could theoretically more than double the current take of about 10 billion pounds, even though such an outcome might be elusive in practice.
Proposals included raising rates levied on sales of assets such as property and shares to align with income tax. Other suggestions included lowering the floor above which the tax becomes liable, targeting more stock-based rewards for employees and abolishing relief on share disposals in unlisted companies.
A more innovative and potentially hugely controversial option that could seek to address growing UK inequality would be a wealth tax.
Last year, the independent Wealth Tax Commission said the UK could raise more than 260 billion pounds with an annual charge of 1% lasting five years on individual assets above 500,000 pounds. About 8 million residents would be affected.
Sunak could also decide that it’s too early to raise taxes, choosing to tolerate a higher debt load until the UK’s recovery is assured. That tactic was mooted last week by a Treasury minister who suggested hikes could be avoided should the economy stage a strong rebound.
“It’s not absolutely obvious therefore that there may be any future need for consolidation, depending on the view you take for taxes,” Financial Secretary to the Treasury Jesse Norman told the House of Commons Treasury Committee.
That approach, which removes the risk of premature tightening that could choke off growth, could be achievable after Bank of England bond purchases to stimulate the economy drove U.K. debt-servicing costs below pre-pandemic levels, despite the borrowing splurge.