Flybe rescue shows it’s tough for governments to go green

Bloomberg

UK carrier Flybe’s struggle for survival has highlighted a key issue facing countries as they move towards more sustainable forms of transport: very often the alternatives to aviation just aren’t there.
The collapse of Britain’s biggest domestic carrier would have cut carbon emissions at a stroke. But faced with a lack of viable rail links to the often far-flung cities Flybe serves, the government instead hatched a rescue plan involving a review of aviation tax and a possible state-backed loan.
Caroline Lucas, Britain’s only Green Party lawmaker, said the intervention was “utterly inconsistent” with combating climate change, and that the state should let high-carbon industries wither. Molly Scott Catto, who represents the UK Greens in the European Parliament, said the government was putting the “convenience of today’s elite travellers” ahead of future generations.
Prime minister Boris Johnson, though, said before the rescue that Flybe played a key role in delivering connectivity across the UK, while acknowledging that Britain lacks sufficient infrastructure “in many parts of our country.” The government also affirmed a commitment to net zero carbon emissions by 2050.

Rescue Mission
Journeys from Birmingham in central England to Inverness in the Scottish Highlands or the Welsh capital Cardiff to the oil city of Aberdeen would take hours longer and cost far more by train, even travelling on some of Britain’s faster lines. And the loss of Flybe routes from Belfast City airport in Northern Ireland could even mean some passengers travelling partly by ferry.
The intervention contrasts with the government’s stance on the collapse of Thomas Cook Group Plc in September and Monarch Airlines in 2017, both focussed on the tourism market and deemed less vital to the UK economy.
Letting Flybe fail without a viable rail alternative could also have pushed more people into their cars, generally more energy efficient than the plane only if each vehicle has multiple occupants, according to EcoPassenger, a website that compares the environmental impact of different modes of transport.

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend