China ups the ante against ‘overseas investment’

epa06143578 Chinese people ride their motorcycles in central business district (CBD) of Beijing, China, 14 August 2017. China's fixed-asset investment grew 8.3 percent year on year in the first seven months of 2017, down from 8.6 percent for the first half, according to the National Bureau of Statistics on 14 August 2017.  EPA/WU HONG

Bloomberg

China formally laid down new rules on overseas investments, making explicit its de facto campaign against “irrational” acquisitions of assets in industries ranging from real estate to hotels and entertainment.
The authorities set out three categories—banned, restricted and encouraged—while backing companies to support the nation’s ambitious “Belt and Road” initiative backed by President Xi Jinping, the State Council said. Property, hotel, film, entertainment and sports investments will now be subject to restrictions, the statement said.
“Profound changes are taking place in international and domestic situations, and Chinese enterprises face not just relatively good opportunities but also various risks and challenges in overseas investments,” the State Council, China’s cabinet, said.
China has embarked on a drive to reduce leverage in financial markets and snuff out systemic risks ahead of a Communist Party leadership transition later this year, while remaining vigilant for accelerated capital outflows that threaten to weaken the nation’s currency. Some of the country’s most aggressive dealmakers—Anbang Insurance Group Co., Fosun International Ltd., Dalian Wanda Group Co. and HNA Group Co.— have already been the target of government pressure to scale back their foreign activities. “This is the state saying we want better say over where China’s resources are going abroad,” said Andrew Polk, co-founder of research firm Trivium China in Beijing. “We didn’t have a clear accounting of this before, but we could piece it all together from what was said by various elements of the government. Now it’s de jure policy while previously it was de facto policy.”
The People’s Bank of China imposed controls as the amount of money flowing out last year topped $816 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, with Macau casinos considered a primary route used by private citizens and corrupt government officials alike. In the presence of controls, China’s capital account and foreign exchange reserves have stabilised this year.

Potential Risks
That said, officials are wary that business activity could undermine the stability of the capital account, as well as introduce risks into the banking sector. The banking regulator this year asked lenders to provide loan information on the country’s top deal-making companies, and is examining examples of acquisitions gone awry by those firms to assess potential risks to the financial sector, people familiar with the matter said.
The recent changes are “part of the precautionary package to prevent a rebound in capital outflows,” said Robin Xing, chief China economist at Morgan Stanley in Hong Kong. “Policy makers are also concerned about the potential investment loss and financial risk related to the takeover of ‘trophy assets,’ a lesson they might have learned from corporate Japan in late 1980s.”
In a separate statement, the National Development and Reform Commission, the top economic planning body, criticised “irrational” overseas investment in some sectors, while encouraging projects linked to the Belt and Road initiative.
Banned: Core military technology, gambling, investments contrary to national security
Restricted: Property, hotels, film, entertainment, sports,
obsolete equipment, investments that contravene environmental standards
Encouraged: Investments that further Belt and Road framework, enhance China’s technical standards, research and development, oil and mining exploration, agriculture and fishing
There have been problems with overseas investments, the NDRC said, adding that some companies made rash decisions and sustained losses.
“Some companies focused on property rather than the real economy, which, instead of boosting the domestic economy, triggered capital outflows and shook financial security,” it said.
Some companies disregarded the environment, energy and safety regulations in target countries, which resulted in disputes and impaired China’s image,
it said.
China’s outbound investment slumped 44.3 percent in the first seven months from a year earlier as policy makers imposed brakes on companies’ foreign acquisition following a record spending spree in 2016.
“China wants its money to focus on specific sectors that can help boost long-term growth potential,” said Zhou Hao, a senior emerging-markets strategist at Commerzbank AG in Singapore.
“The new policy also tries to close the loophole of suspicious capital outflows and possible money laundering.”

epa05928277 A woman views properties for sale and rent at a real estate agent shop on Austin Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China, 26 April 2017. According to media reports, property consultant Colliers stated on 25 April that mainland Chinese buyers bought a record HK$36.1 billion (4.63 billion euro or 5.05 billion US dollar) worth of Hong Kong property during the first three months of this year, which is more than double the amount spent during the same period last year. Despite a raft of property price cooling measures introduced by the Hong Kong government since 2009, Hong Kong's luxury property market continues to defy market expectations of a downturn, and continues to rise. Colliers now expects Hong Kong to overtake New York by the end of 2017 to become the most popular property market for mainland Chinese investors.  EPA/ALEX HOFFORD

Chinese pullback won’t dent real estate prices: Brookfield
Bloomberg

Commercial real estate prices, hovering at record highs in the US following a six-year boom, are sustainable even as Chinese regulators tighten restrictions on overseas investment, according to Brookfield Property Partners LP.
There is enough capital pouring into real estate from
multiple regions—including Europe and the Middle East—to counter any potential slowdown in Chinese investment, Brookfield Property Chief
Executive Officer Brian Kingston said in a Bloomberg Television interview.
While Asian buyers are often part of the equation, a global shift from low-yield fixed-income holdings to real estate will drive property values for the foreseeable future, he said.
“There was a lot of headlines around how much capital was coming out of Asia,” said Kingston, a senior managing partner at Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the parent company of Brookfield Property. “The reality is it’s broad-based. It comes from a lot of places.”
Price growth for US commercial buildings such as office towers and apartment buildings has leveled off over the past year, according to research firm Green Street Advisors LLC, and a growing disconnect between buyers and sellers is putting a damper on new deals.
In Manhattan, one of the biggest beneficiaries of a foreign-capital influx in recent years, transaction volume plunged 39 percent to $18 billion in the first half from a year earlier, according to the Real
Estate Board of New York, a trade organisation.

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend