The Gulf Time Newspaper One of the finest business newspapers in the UAE brought to you by our professional writers and editors.
So get this. A US-listed, Cayman Islands-domiciled, Chinese internet company is seeking to sell shares in China, so that it can become more internationalised.
That’s among the bizarre rationales for NetEase Inc’s offering in Hong Kong, 20 years after the company first debuted on the Nasdaq. The elephant in the room, which gets the briefest of mentions in its 458-page prospectus, is that NetEase is among a raft of Chinese companies that may be booted from US bourses entirely.
In his letter to shareholders, William Ding, the founder and chief executive officer, outlines the future of NetEase. Among the plans: going global while solidifying its position in China.
He’s putting shareholder money where his mouth is. Around HK$9.6 billion ($1.2 billion), or 45% of the expected HK$21.3 billion to be raised in the initial public offering this week, will go towards strategies to make the business more international, the document says. A mere 10% will be put toward general corporate purposes, including mergers and acquisitions.
According to Ding, NetEase has been exploring the world over the past few years, though “some people might not have noticed these efforts.†He’s right about that.
The world’s second-largest mobile games company, behind Tencent Holdings Ltd, has launched more than 50 mobile titles since 2015, but garners a mere 11% of gaming revenue outside China. With a huge team of developers and a 20-year history, you’d think that if NetEase was truly going global, it would have a bit more to show for it by now.
So, the money to be put towards globalisation is around 165% of the sales reaped overseas last year. It’s not like NetEase needs even a dime of that Hong Kong IPO cash. It had around HK$82 billion in cash and equivalents at the end of March, almost four times the amount to be raised in the new share sale. It generated free cash flow of HK$18.2 billion last year.
But when you’re asking investors for HK$21 billion in cash that you don’t really need, “going global†is a much better sales pitch than, “We might get kicked off one of the world’s major stock exchanges.â€
You can’t really blame NetEase for that. It’s among dozens of companies left in limbo as the Beijing-Washington spat escalates to the point of Congress passing laws requiring US-listed Chinese companies to be transparent. As the prospectus notes, Beijing doesn’t allow Chinese auditing firms to be subject to the inspection of the US’s Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. That leaves NetEase in a race to list elsewhere, soon to be joined in Hong Kong by Nasdaq-traded e-commerce company JD.com Inc.
The problem with doing an IPO two decades after doing an IPO is that you can no longer crib from that youthful “the future is ours†playbook. You’re saddled with the realities of being a middle-aged internet company in a huge market that’s peaked.
—Bloomberg