Pakistan’s decision to set free alleged terrorist leader draws US criticism

epa06348222 Hafiz Saeed (C), the head of banned Islamic charity Jamat ud Dawa, arrives for Friday prayers in Lahore, Pakistan, 24 November 2017. The leader of Jamat ud Dawa, Hafiz Saeed, accused by the United States and India of being the mastermind behind the attack that left 166 dead in the Indian city of Mumbai in 2008, was released after 10 months of house arrest.  EPA-EFE/RAHAT DAR


Bloomberg

Pakistan’s decision to set free the alleged mastermind of the 2008 attacks in Mumbai drew quick criticism from the US, where President Donald Trump has demanded that Pakistani leaders take tougher action against terrorists.
Hafiz Saeed, who allegedly planned attacks in Mumbai in 2008 that left 164 people dead, had been detained at his house in Lahore without charges since January. A Pakistan High Court had ordered his release, and police withdrew from the home after midnight, his spokesman Habibullah Qamar said in a text message.
“The United States is deeply concerned” that Saeed has been released from house arrest, State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said in a statement. She said Saeed leads Lashkar-e-Taiba,”a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization responsible for the death of hundreds of innocent civilians in terrorist attacks, including a number of American citizens.” Saeed has consistently denied any involvement in the Mumbai attacks. He heads charity Jamaat-ud-Dawa, which the US says is a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba. A United Nations Security Council panel placed sanctions on four alleged members of Lashkar-e-Taiba, including Saeed, in 2008 at the request of the US and India.
Saeed’s detention in Lahore since January was initially interpreted as an attempt to placate the US, which has taken a tougher tone on Pakistan under Trump. In a speech in August, Trump said, “Pakistan often gives safe haven to agents of chaos, violence, and terror” and that must change immediately or the US would stop providing financial assistance.
Saeed’s release suggests Pakistan’s military, which has controlled the nation for much of its 70-year history, is once again asserting control over the coun-try’s civilian authorities and that terrorism suspects won’t be genuinely prosecuted by Islamabad, said Harsh Pant,
an international relations professor at King’s College London.
Since a September by-election in Lahore, where a number of right-wing religious groups strongly campaigned for independent candidates, Pakistan’s military has been accused of “mainstreaming” extremist outfits and re-branding them as political entities to contest elections — a charge the armed forces rebut. Elements of the armed forces have historically fostered ties with insurgents targeting neighboring Afghanistan and India.

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend