US threatens to block Britain from procurement accord


The US is threatening to block the UK from a 46-nation public procurement agreement, a move that would deny British companies from accessing a near $2 trillion marketplace after leaving the European Union, according to two officials with knowledge of the situation.
The UK will apply to rejoin the Government Procurement Agreement, a $1.7 trillion trade accord that governs global appropriation rules, since it will lose its membership after Brexit in March. US negotiators have told their British counterparts that their application is outdated and needs to be revised, said the officials, who asked not to be identified because talks are ongoing.
If blocked from the pact, UK companies such as Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc and Serco Group Plc could lose access to members’ procurement processes, including the $837 billion US market. The UK will ask GPA participants to provisionally approve its final offer to join the accord during an October 17 meeting, where any member can block the accession bid. The British side would still have time to improve its offer to allay members’ concerns.
A majority of the accord’s members “support the UK continuing to be a part of it after we leave the European Union, which is in everyone’s interest,” according to an emailed statement from a spokesman for the UK’s Department of International Trade. “The UK is a huge part of this agreement and our continued membership will allow companies from other countries to maintain access to UK contracts worth 68 billion pounds a year.”

The purpose of the GPA is to open up government procurement markets to foreign competition, and help make the process more transparent. British officials argue that the UK is a special case and should receive expedited approval because it’s already a member and can simply replicate its current commitments.
Though the UK currently participates in the GPA via the EU, Britain never independently ratified the agreement and must now rejoin as a member in its own right in order to ensure continuity following its departure from the European trading bloc. At least two other members of the agreement are dissatisfied with the UK’s application and doubt that it will be accepted on October 17, according to two other officials.
Despite the hurdles facing the British government, a resolution involving an improved UK offer will likely be struck, according to Stuart Harbinson, a former senior trade official at the World Trade Organization and a senior consultant on international trade for the Brussels-based Hume Brophy communications agency.
“It would be an act of senseless protectionism if the UK were shut out of the GPA,” Harbinson said. “There is a lot of senseless protectionism around at present. But in this case my bet would be that when the GPA members think they have squeezed the UK as much as they can they will agree to the UK joining as an independent member.”
The US move fits a pattern of trade strategy President Donald Trump’s administration has recently utilised to its benefit, exploiting points of leverage to exact an upper hand in negotiations, even when the party across the table is a close ally. The US imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum imports before negotiating an updated free-trade agreement with Mexico and Canada; and Trump has threatened the EU with levies on its car exports as the two sides deliberate over a new trade pact.
“The US and other major countries see this current period as the best time to try to get concessions from the UK,” said David Henig, a director at the European Centre for International Political Economy. “They know the UK is preparing for no-deal with the EU, and need to have everything at place in the WTO in that eventuality.”

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend