S Korea must find fix to WWII labour case, says Japan’s Kono


Japan’s top diplomat says it is up to South Korea to resolve forced labour claims looming over dozens of Japanese companies that are threatening to upend ties between the two neighbours.
Foreign Minister Taro Kono said in an interview that the South Korean Supreme Court’s decision ordering a Japanese company to pay compensation to people forced into its service during Japan’s 1910-45 occupation of the country posed a “serious challenge” to relations. Japan holds that such claims were settled under a 1965 treaty, which came with a $300 million payment.
“It’s obvious: they are responsible for taking care of all the claims from the Korean people. So that’s what they have to do,” Kono said told Bloomberg News in Tokyo. “That’s what’s in the 1965 agreement.” The court said Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp. must pay 100 million won ($88,000) compensation to each of four plaintiffs who had sued over being forced to work for a forerunner of the company prior to 1945. There are 15 other cases pending in South Korea involving 69 companies, according to the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The ruling is one of several disputes to emerge between the key US allies since South Korea elected President Moon Jae-in last year. The two sides have also sparred over a pact to
resolve disagreements over women trafficked to Japanese Imperial Army brothels before and during World War II and a spat over the “Rising Sun” flag that prompted Japan to withdraw from an international fleet review last month.
Kono described the forced labour case as a “totally different level of issue” from the others. “If any country gets into an agreement with the Korean government in international law and the Korean Supreme Court could overturn the agreement any time they wish to, it would be difficult for any country to do anything with the South Korean government,’’ Kono said. “So they have to take care of this issue first,” or ties cannot move forward, he added.
Separately, Kono dismissed recent suggestions by US officials that Japan could be forced to go beyond the limits it has laid down for bilateral trade talks expected to start in January. He said the US must provide something in return for any Japanese concessions.
Japan relented after almost two years of stalling and agreed to trade talks with the US following threats of tariffs on cars. In a bid to balance out its trade deficit, the US is pushing for more access for its own cars as well as for farm products, after President Donald Trump pulled out of the regional Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has said the negotiations will be narrower in scope than a free-trade agreement, and the two sides agreed Japan wouldn’t be forced to offer more access to its sensitive agriculture market than it already
provides under other trade agreements.
But Vice President Mike Pence said later that the US would hold talks for a free-trade agreement with Japan, while Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue was reported as saying the US should get at least as much access to Japanese markets as the EU, or members of the Trans-Pacific Partnership regional deal, which comes into force on December 30.
“The prime minister and the president create the framework and the negotiation will be within the framework,” Kono said. “Any trade negotiation must be mutually satisfactory, or there won’t be any agreement.
If we give something to the US, the US will need to give something to us.‘’

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend